W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

HTTP/1.1 revision status [was: HTTP/1.1bis draft -26]

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:56:33 +1100
Message-Id: <73DB6A9E-781F-4095-B762-61201F53D558@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
…and the final DISCUSS has been marked as resolved, so the -26 drafts will go forward. We have a few more process things to go through (e.g., final checks on the changes by IANA, as well as handling any issues at the RFC editor stage), but essentially the revision of HTTP/1.1 is done. 

Thanks to everyone who contributed (there’s a long list at the end of p1), especially Julian Reschke and Roy Fielding, as well as our four (!) sponsoring Area Directors over the years - Lisa Dusseault, Alexey Melnikov, Peter Saint-Andre and Barry Leiba.

We’ll keep the WG informed as the specs progress through these final stages.


P.S. You can see all six-plus years of repository commits visualised here:

On 6 Feb 2014, at 8:41 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> As you can see, we now have a 26th round of drafts for the revision of HTTP/1.1. The editors and I believe that this incorporates all of the comments gathered in the IESG review process, and addresses the matters that they requested that we discuss.
> Please have a look at the diffs and bring any serious concerns with them to the list. The IESG is still reviewing a few of the last changes, so this *might* not be our last round. That said, the end is very close.
> Thanks again to Julian and Roy for all of their hard work on this; please don't let them buy their own beer in London.
> Regards,
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 02:56:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC