Re: #545 requirement on implementing methods according to their semantics from Mark Nottingham on 2014-01-06 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:47:19 +1100
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AA4F2D31-B381-4B45-8847-FC245F6379C8@mnot.net>

On 4 Jan 2014, at 9:14 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> I think we need a clear statement that a server that implements a method not defined in P2 but registered with IANA needs to follow the spec as referenced by the IANA registry.

+1


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Monday, 6 January 2014 05:47:49 UTC