W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal

From: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:36:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJ_4DfTts2A4J-vW1b=fZHr5Ou6yfu7GxF6yZg_jBk1pGG5hNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Is the expectation that when a client sees such an error/status code that
it should retry the request on a non-alternate service?


On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:54 PM, William Chan (陈智昌)
<willchan@chromium.org>wrote:

> Hm, superficially it seems pretty similar to 404 to me as well. I guess a
> different status code might help in debugging though.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
>> WFM too.
>>
>> BTW, I’ve started collecting issues against the draft here:
>>   https://github.com/mnot/I-D/issues?labels=alt-svc&page=1&state=open
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> On 27 Feb 2014, at 12:22 am, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Martin - that makes sense to me. Next time we update the draft we can
>> rewrite the http/2 stream error code as a 4xx HTTP/* status code.
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 04:37:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC