- From: Rob Trace <Rob.Trace@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 04:26:48 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- CC: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
While I can see value in a one day meeting in London, I agree with Martin. I would vote for an interim between London and Toronto but we can discuss it in Zurich. Thanks!! -Robt -----Original Message----- From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2014 3:12 PM To: Roberto Peon Cc: William Chan (陈智昌); Patrick McManus; Mark Nottingham; HTTP Working Group Subject: Re: Interim meeting around London? On 9 January 2014 11:29, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > Things inevitably come up after the regular course of IETF meetings, > and being able to discuss them right away is useful. > I wouldn't mind a single day, immediately after the regular week's > meetings, but anything more than that seems like a waste of time. I've been burned pretty badly on a meeting in the week after the IETF. I found that most attendees were basically non-functioning at that point. There were further extenuating circumstances, but I'm a little reluctant to schedule something (and it does need to be scheduled) without something concrete that we need to achieve. I'd feel more confident about choosing a time after Zurich.
Received on Friday, 10 January 2014 04:27:18 UTC