- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 18:32:07 +0000
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
- CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 01/18/2014 06:23 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <CANmPAYFm=Vm-L=smSU8XVN6N4fjWWYr=Y0u+Bkg4ryWopZvUbA@mail.gmail.com> > , Peter Lepeska writes: > >> Now to see which goals are met by each proposal... >> >> 6.2. Goals > > I'd suggest we also look at how the proposed schemes handle when > there are multiple proxies in the path between the client and server. > > Some of the schemes, #4 for instance, fails that criteria. And also whether or not proposals have impact beyond HTTP and if so are they accompanied by a full analysis of that impact. S. >
Received on Saturday, 18 January 2014 18:32:30 UTC