W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Compression ratio of HPACK.

From: Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:27:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHzwyDvFfqUx78_k7mLmXUySdV3QEpQf1aqEf0Mp5PiqHFSwaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Really interesting, Kazu.  I would love to cut out gears if we are only
saving a byte and a half.  Can someone else who profiled hpack review this
data and conclusion?

-A
On Jan 29, 2014 9:09 PM, "Kazu Yamamoto" <kazu@iij.ad.jp> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I implemented 6 kinds of HPACK 05 encoding and calculated compression
> ratio with the help from the Japanese HTTP/2 community. I wrote a blog
> article on it.
>
>         http://d.hatena.ne.jp/kazu-yamamoto/20140129/1391057824
>
> In short, reference set saves only 1.57 byte per HEADERS frame in
> average. So, I would suggest the designers to remove reference set.
>
> If you guys want to calculate compression ratio with other data set,
> please let me know.
>
> --Kazu
>
>
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2014 15:28:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:23 UTC