+1 On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote: > i agree we should take this to london > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > We discussed priority levelling < > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/270> in Zurich, and decided > there to take Roberto's "Weighted Dependency Tree" approach. > > However, discussion on the list since has moved on to other proposals, > especially Osama's: < > http://www.w3.org/mid/f2d284792b50431685dc551141945bec@SN2PR03MB046.namprd03.prod.outlook.com > > > > It's not clear to me that we have consensus on one approach here yet. > > We also said that we'd put out another Implementation Draft before London, > but with the date fast approaching, we need to either choose one quickly or > defer the Implementation Draft. > > Unless we converge in the next day or so, I think Martin should ship a > draft -10 with the "vanilla" priority field as before, and we can discuss > this issue in more depth in London (presumably shipping an implementation > draft shortly thereafter). > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 15:31:42 UTC