W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion: ML for HTTP2 proxy discussion ?

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:41:17 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <89AB31CA-045A-4433-81B2-BC822DF9B73B@mnot.net>
To: emile.stephan@orange.com
If we dispose of all of our issues regarding HTTP/2 — remember, we’re chartered to go to WGLC very soon — we can make time for a discussion of proxies, of course. 


On 27 Feb 2014, at 12:41 am, <emile.stephan@orange.com> <emile.stephan@orange.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark
> IMO, the HTTPbis WG must take time to structure the work on the http2 proxy topic during the meetings of next week.
> Cheers
> Emile
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] 
> Envoyé : mardi 25 février 2014 22:18
> Cc : HTTP Working Group
> Objet : Re: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion: ML for HTTP2 proxy discussion ?
> Hi Emile, 
> On 26 Feb 2014, at 1:46 am, emile.stephan@orange.com wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>> I support Salvatore initiative and the contributions you and Roberto made on this topic. IMO, the work on http2 proxy deserves at least a dedicated mailing list, the wiki page is definitively not enough. Furthermore I consider that it should be great to start structuring this work during the next meeting. 
> I was thinking about that earlier too.
> I'm slightly concerned that if we had a separate list, we'll have a situation where people on that list get agreement among themselves, but then come down and immediately get shot down by everyone else. 
> Keeping the conversation here is my preference; again, my e-mail was about making the conversation more efficient, not stopping it. If it gets unmanageable (which it is not yet), we can talk about it then. Also, if we get HTTP/2 to WGLC soon, that will make the impact of other discussions here easier to deal with.
> Cheers,
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.

Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 23:41:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC