Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request from Martin Thomson on 2014-03-26 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:27:13 -0700
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, K.Morgan@iaea.org, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVFRxZrUT-MTahenZzytXmjMkP30qedPP71Shjy9_0yBQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 25 March 2014 21:06, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:
> Does anyone have a reason (aside from YAGNI) that we wouldn't want to pursue
> this new frame type?

I don't know.  YAGNI is a pretty killer argument.

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2014 04:27:41 UTC