- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:07:21 -0700
- To: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 14 March 2014 10:59, Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de> wrote: > I think this can't be mandated as sometimes the content-length may not be > known in advance, but you can make it optional. If we were to allow this, then the sender would be required to provide this new "uncompressed-length" header field. As Patrick pointed out, the alternative is breaking some servers.
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 18:07:49 UTC