Re: The first settings

• From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:48:44 -0800
• To: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
• Cc: Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CABkgnnW69p3BD4BFJfBvqn_yOVZDiUy=-_=9SCu7wcQZ5gkDow@mail.gmail.com>

On 27 February 2014 13:28, Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> wrote:
> if the SETTINGS following the client preface doesn't contain those
> parameters like an empty SETTINGS frame as Cory mentioned, the clients are
> exposed to the default values

Ahh, this is the question.  Well, that's just an inconsistency.

I think that it's perfectly OK to leave yourself exposed in this way.
Others disagree.  No effort has been made to fix it.  Someone once
suggested that we require all settings values always, for this reason.

Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 21:49:12 UTC