Re: Server Push -> Cache Push?

No, I think that would add to confusion, especially if we ever change the
spec to allow push of no-cache resources, etc.
On Jan 29, 2014 4:00 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> I've noticed some confusion when I talk to people about server push,
> because it's not clear whether the server is being pushed to or from, and
> it doesn't make clear what's really happening.
>
> What do people think about calling it "cache push" instead? To me, it gets
> to the heart of what's happening more clearly.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 30 January 2014 00:06:12 UTC