W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Server Push -> Cache Push?

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:05:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNffV3ekpQU2xaALq9YjV3EA_OG_RFKPdb=YP_8DB2f3Ow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
No, I think that would add to confusion, especially if we ever change the
spec to allow push of no-cache resources, etc.
On Jan 29, 2014 4:00 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> I've noticed some confusion when I talk to people about server push,
> because it's not clear whether the server is being pushed to or from, and
> it doesn't make clear what's really happening.
>
> What do people think about calling it "cache push" instead? To me, it gets
> to the heart of what's happening more clearly.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2014 00:06:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:23 UTC