Re: Priorities

Julian,

+1 on the content in the diffs.


On Jan 28, 2014, at 4:26 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi there.
> 
> I appreciate the interesting discussion about the name of a constant in the HTTP/2 spec.
> 
> However I'd like to remind all of us about our charter which very clearly states in <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charters>
> 
> "The Working Group will give priority to HTTP/1.1 work until that work is complete."
> 
> Right now the HTTP/1.1 specs are past IESG evaluation, with a lot of COMMENTs and a few DISCUSSes being resolved.
> 
> It would be awesome if we could get a few participants to review what has changed since -25; see either the trac timeline <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/timeline>, the issues list (<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/query?status=assigned&status=closed&status=new&status=reopened&milestone=26&col=id&col=summary&col=milestone&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&order=priority>), or the diff documents:
> 
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest-from-previous.diff.html>
> 
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest-from-previous.diff.html
> 
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-latest-from-previous.diff.html>
> 
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest-from-previous.diff.html>
> 
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-latest-from-previous.diff.html>
> 
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-latest-from-previous.diff.html>
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair