- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 17:51:08 +0100
- To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Le Mar 7 janvier 2014 15:37, Poul-Henning Kamp a écrit : > In message <8170731E-E9A2-4A64-8087-F543DC163454@mnot.net>, Mark > Nottingham wri > tes: > >>That said, if an implementation wanted to publish an Informational RFC >>documenting their HTTP2-friendly log format, that's entirely doable, >>and I'm sure they'd get some help if they asked. > > Purely as a matter of making it easier for people to adopt HTTP/2.0, > it might be a good idea to be a *little* bit more proactive than that. And, it would make the protocol better (actually thinking how it will be used, and making sure things can be logged for example not forgetting to reserve a symbol in headers that can be used as log separator) Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 16:51:39 UTC