Re: Server Push -> Cache Push?

On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> I've noticed some confusion when I talk to people about server push, because 
> it's not clear whether the server is being pushed to or from, and it doesn't 
> make clear what's really happening.
>
> What do people think about calling it "cache push" instead? To me, it gets 
> to the heart of what's happening more clearly.

I think we've talked about "server push" long enough (from SPDY and onwards) 
that changing the term now risks _adding_ confusion for those who are in the 
loop and have learned what it is.

Also, I can't say I like any of the suggested alternative names as much.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

Received on Thursday, 30 January 2014 09:24:44 UTC