- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:54:10 +0000
- To: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
- cc: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Osama Mazahir <OSAMAM@microsoft.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Matthew Cox <macox@microsoft.com>
In message <CACuKZqF0oxcpJWYnDzzVSwzeJgQ4K18gZCynyYh0uJwY=4xHtA@mail.gmail.com> , Zhong Yu writes: >Can you give an example where an intermediary benefits from decoding >URI octets into unicodes? Not necessarily from converting them into unicodes, but normalising them using whatever rule we might prefer, so that cache-lookups will always find the same object, no matter how the URI was mangled with encodings. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 20:54:35 UTC