- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:26:02 +0100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi there. I appreciate the interesting discussion about the name of a constant in the HTTP/2 spec. However I'd like to remind all of us about our charter which very clearly states in <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charters> "The Working Group will give priority to HTTP/1.1 work until that work is complete." Right now the HTTP/1.1 specs are past IESG evaluation, with a lot of COMMENTs and a few DISCUSSes being resolved. It would be awesome if we could get a few participants to review what has changed since -25; see either the trac timeline <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/timeline>, the issues list (<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/query?status=assigned&status=closed&status=new&status=reopened&milestone=26&col=id&col=summary&col=milestone&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&order=priority>), or the diff documents: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-latest-from-previous.diff.html> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest-from-previous.diff.html <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-latest-from-previous.diff.html> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-latest-from-previous.diff.html> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-latest-from-previous.diff.html> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-latest-from-previous.diff.html> Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 09:26:46 UTC