Re: New Version Notification for draft-hunt-http-rest-redirect-00.txt

On 2014-01-16 16:42, Phil Hunt wrote:
> Assuming you are refering to the 308 redirect draft. What is the current reference for 308?

No, I'm referring to citing RFC 2616.

> REST services need redirects that do not convert to GET. That would corrupt the operation.

Yes. For some value of "Rest services"; I'd recommend to avoid that term 
altogether; just define an HTTP based service that makes sense and uses 
HTTP properly.


Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 15:50:49 UTC