Re: Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307

What is the objection to 308?  

If there is good reason not to use it, why not pick another code?

Phil

@independentid
www.independentid.com
phil.hunt@oracle.com

On 2014-01-16, at 12:23 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 2014-01-16 21:11, Phil Hunt wrote:
>> Both 301 and 302 say to use 307 if conversion to GET is not desired.
>> 
>> With 307 used for both temporary and perm redirect, 307 loses meaning causing the confusion.
>> 
>> Phil
>> ...
> 
> Do you have a concrete change proposal that doesn't require putting 308 into the base spec?
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 

Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 20:43:40 UTC