W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Poll: Design Team Meeting after London

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:01:12 +1100
Message-Id: <322998EB-4EF8-4E76-832F-E7353C765315@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hello again,

Based upon the feedback, my inclination is to:

1) Request an extra session in the London IETF, so we have more time to discuss issues, and
2) Schedule a design team meeting on the Saturday afterwards for interested folks to talk / do interop (note that design team meetings can’t make decisions, but can create proposals), and
3) Hold an interim in the future if/as needs dictate.

If you’re interested in participating in a design team meeting on the Saturday, please fill out this poll:


… so we can gauge interest and find appropriate facilities. We’ll make the final call on holding that meeting during Zurich.


On 9 Jan 2014, at 2:11 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
> We’ve previously talked about the possibility of another interim meeting piggybacking upon IETF London, much as we did for Berlin/Hamburg.
> Since there are only about four weeks between our Zurich interim and London, and we haven’t had our Zurich meeting yet, it’s not clear how useful that meeting would be. 
> One the one hand, we’re trying to finish the “core” specification soon, and it would be good to keep velocity up and close any lingering issues around the spec. On the other, the small gap between meetings means that it’s unlikely we’ll have big spec or implementation updates to discuss/interop.
> Ideally, we’d decide *after* Zurich, but that would make the travel and meeting planning cycle really tight.
> I think the options are roughly:
> a) Feb 26-28 or 27-28 in London (avoiding overlap with the STRINT workshop as necessary)
> b) Mar 8 in London (one-day Saturday meeting to clean up any dangling issues)
> c) Wait until April or June, if necessary, location TBD
> If we did (b), I’d request that the HTTPbis meeting during IETF be late in the week, to make people’s travel a bit more convenient.
> I’d be interested to hear what people think. Note that this is not a vote :)
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 12 January 2014 00:01:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:23 UTC