W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Small editorial clarification to p2-semantics

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 08:40:09 -0400
Message-ID: <53259BA9.7070909@dbooth.org>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
has a sentence that says:
    If Content-Location is included in a 2xx (Successful) response
    message and its field-value refers to a URI that differs from the
    effective request URI, then the origin server claims that the URI is
    an identifier for a different resource corresponding to the enclosed
but the phrase "then the origin server claims that the URI" is 
ambiguous, because there are *two* URIs under discussion: the effective 
request URI and the Content-Location URI.  I *think* "the URI" in that 
phrase is intended to mean the Content-Location URI, but it would be 
good to be explicit.

Received on Sunday, 16 March 2014 12:40:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC