W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate

From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:39:57 +1000
Message-ID: <CACweHNCez=04KH=rUMabY4V3x_beePx+oNObpncRCfoXBtOumw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 21 February 2014 15:32, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:

> On 21/02/2014 5:13 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > So, what the current text *really* says is that servers can ignore the
> 'identity' content-encoding when it appears alone in the request.
>
> Huh? identiy coding being explicitly sent is a non-empty field.
>
> I read that as saying only an empty header means "anything goes, YMMV",
> and * value meaning "anything goes, honest, I promise"
>

The other current text, in HTTP/2, that says:

| Clients MUST support gzip compression for HTTP request bodies.
| Regardless of the value of the accept-encoding header field, a server
| MAY send responses with gzip or deflate encoding.

IOW "Accept-Encoding: identity" can be ignored, because you can still gzip
the response.

-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Received on Friday, 21 February 2014 05:40:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC