Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft from Roland Zink on 2014-02-25 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:40:45 +0100
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <530C651D.4000404@zinks.de>

On 24.02.2014 22:25, William Chan (陈智昌) wrote:
> I've asked this before, and I still think it's a reasonable question.
> Is there another vendor that wants to interop with this kind of proxy?
> I'm asking this because I think that the purpose of standardizing such
> a proposal is for interoperability across vendors, and I don't see the
> point if the only implementations are Ericsson. But I may be
> misunderstanding IETF policy here.
There are other implementations of "secure proxies" like Chrome on 
Android can use a Google proxy. Why should a user trust the Google proxy 
more than a proxy from <insert your favorite mobile network operator>? 
An interoperability would be good.

Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 09:41:08 UTC