- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 09:51:10 +0100
- To: emile.stephan@orange.com
- Cc: "Peter Lepeska" <bizzbyster@gmail.com>, "Salvatore Loreto" <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>, "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@gmail.com>, "Patrick McManus" <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Le Ven 28 février 2014 08:23, emile.stephan@orange.com a écrit : > Hi > > +1 for Salvatore proposal of including “Secure proxy” definition in the > core spec. > +1 for peter proposal of including discovery mechanism for HTTP URIs in > the core spec too. +1 You can't do proxies in isolation separate from the main spec, if the other participants in the http2 dialog ignore the proxy bits or implement them as an afterthought there will be misundertandings, quirky connexions, angry users and support calls (and they won't be addressed solely to proxy operators). -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2014 08:52:18 UTC