Re: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion: ML for HTTP2 proxy discussion ? from Barry Leiba on 2014-02-25 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:40:33 -0800
To: "emile.stephan@orange.com" <emile.stephan@orange.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CALaySJJpVhnUNxfnpPn8dqVsgEXv_=gZO3YRNLbCm6+qudbwLg@mail.gmail.com>

Why was I added to the CC list on this?  Please, folks: I am
subscribed to the mailing list.  There's no reason to include me
explicitly unless there's something specific you want me to do.

Thanks,
Barry

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:46 AM,  <emile.stephan@orange.com> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I support Salvatore initiative and the contributions you and Roberto made on this topic. IMO, the work on http2 proxy deserves at least a dedicated mailing list, the wiki page is definitively not enough. Furthermore I consider that it should be great to start structuring this work during the next meeting.
>
> Regards
> Emile

Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 15:41:00 UTC