- From: 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:41:05 -0800
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > On 24 Feb 2014, at 5:35 pm, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote: > >> I don't think that there's anything HTTP/2 specific about "secure" proxies. > > That's kind of what I'm getting at... Apologies, I clearly missed that sentence later in your email :) I'm going to blame it on my cold. > >> Should we decouple it and just standardize it separately from HTTP/2 (although I think it's likely that the HTTP/2 spec may want to reference it)? > > Well, my point was that I wasn't even sure it's something "we" need to do (i.e., this WG). What actually would need to be written down? Uh, good point. I dunno :) > > Cheers, > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > >
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 06:41:34 UTC