- From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:47:02 +0000
- To: Rob Trace <Rob.Trace@microsoft.com>
- CC: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
my preference is also for an interim between London and Toronto but I can also see the value of a one day meeting in London right after the IETF week (saturday or sunday after the IETF week) /Salvatore On Jan 10, 2014, at 5:26 AM, Rob Trace <Rob.Trace@microsoft.com> wrote: > While I can see value in a one day meeting in London, I agree with Martin. I would vote for an interim between London and Toronto but we can discuss it in Zurich. > > Thanks!! > > -Robt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2014 3:12 PM > To: Roberto Peon > Cc: William Chan (陈智昌); Patrick McManus; Mark Nottingham; HTTP Working Group > Subject: Re: Interim meeting around London? > > On 9 January 2014 11:29, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: >> Things inevitably come up after the regular course of IETF meetings, >> and being able to discuss them right away is useful. >> I wouldn't mind a single day, immediately after the regular week's >> meetings, but anything more than that seems like a waste of time. > > I've been burned pretty badly on a meeting in the week after the IETF. > I found that most attendees were basically non-functioning at that point. There were further extenuating circumstances, but I'm a little reluctant to schedule something (and it does need to be scheduled) without something concrete that we need to achieve. > > I'd feel more confident about choosing a time after Zurich. >
Received on Friday, 10 January 2014 10:47:34 UTC