- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:49:26 -0800
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 14 February 2014 12:25, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > I am completely uninterested in any option that keeps full RFC6455 semantics > (frame extensions make zero sense) without significant ofsetting benefits, > and I would work to ensure such was not again created at IETF, and would > work to ensure that it was not implemented at Google. I too wondered why there was a need to tunnel thewebsocketprotocol as opposed to creating a way to map the semantics efficiently.
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 21:49:54 UTC