W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:49:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW9jYcONs4gtUwFkq8Q8rMSH-d0ihHDszC68oQW+SPWCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 14 February 2014 12:25, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am completely uninterested in any option that keeps full RFC6455 semantics
> (frame extensions make zero sense) without significant ofsetting benefits,
> and I would work to ensure such was not again created at IETF, and would
> work to ensure that it was not implemented at Google.

I too wondered why there was a need to tunnel thewebsocketprotocol as
opposed to creating a way to map the semantics efficiently.
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 21:49:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC