Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general from Martin Thomson on 2014-03-03 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:49:45 -0800
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWhWsn=oNSZcCGtkJoRRt5S-AgBr1G6=PC5ByweQFGtXw@mail.gmail.com>

On 3 March 2014 01:43, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm concerned that, given the way this discussion has been heading, we may
> see a combinatorial explosion of ALPN IDs.
> I've opened: https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/422 as a result.

I really don't see how you can reach that conclusion.  I guess that we
have a different understanding of what an ALPN token is supposed to
mean.

Received on Monday, 3 March 2014 09:50:13 UTC