- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:19:38 +1300
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 1/03/2014 3:25 p.m., Matthew Kerwin wrote: > On 1 March 2014 11:57, Amos Jeffries wrote: > >> On 1/03/2014 5:09 a.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> >>> On 27 Feb 2014, at 6:22 pm, Martin Thomson wrote: >>> >>>> (As proposed by Mark, "h2" would be exclusively for HTTP/2 over >>>> cleartext TCP; I'd prefer to swap the labels, but we know what we call >>>> that sort of argument.) >>> >>> I'd be OK with "h2" for TLS and something like "h2p" (for "plaintext"). >> >> >> FWIW: I prefer the orginal proposal where the 't' signified the >> injection of TLS layer between HTTP/2 and TCP. >> >> > And my two cents, because I love painting sheds: I prefer 'h2s' for HTTP/2 > over TLS, for its symmetry with http/https. > I thought about suggesting that, but we are actually wanting to *detach* the symmetry. => h2t in the proxy cases TLS without meaning HTTPS specifically. Amos
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2014 05:20:09 UTC