W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:43:38 +0100
Message-ID: <53187B8A.5030706@gmx.de>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-03-06 14:41, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 6 March 2014 11:48, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, it depends on the schedule for the document as compared to http/2 and
>> how we tie up other aspects, I guess..
> Unless we want to rewind on some of the decisions we've made, I only
> see two options:
> 1. Make Alt-Svc a normative reference of HTTP/2, effectively including
> its contents by reference, much as we are doing with HPACK.
> 2. Inline Alt-Svc.
> In both cases, we don't get to publish HTTP/2 until Alt-Svc is done.
> I know that we are trying to ensure that inlining doesn't happen, but
> I think that in this case, there is an advantage to it.

That's why I was bringing it up. Let's decide this ASAP; I believe if we 
do it we can have a separate document ready early enough.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 13:44:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC