- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:43:38 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-03-06 14:41, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 6 March 2014 11:48, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: >> So, it depends on the schedule for the document as compared to http/2 and >> how we tie up other aspects, I guess.. > > Unless we want to rewind on some of the decisions we've made, I only > see two options: > > 1. Make Alt-Svc a normative reference of HTTP/2, effectively including > its contents by reference, much as we are doing with HPACK. > 2. Inline Alt-Svc. > > In both cases, we don't get to publish HTTP/2 until Alt-Svc is done. > > I know that we are trying to ensure that inlining doesn't happen, but > I think that in this case, there is an advantage to it. That's why I was bringing it up. Let's decide this ASAP; I believe if we do it we can have a separate document ready early enough. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 13:44:12 UTC