- From: Best <http@florianbest.de>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:17:03 +0000
- To: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Hello httpbis, The following sentence in RFC 2616 is not detailed enough to understand fully: RFC 2616 Section 9.6 - PUT …"If the resource could not be created or modified with the Request-URI, an appropriate error response SHOULD be given that reflects the nature of the problem."… De-facto many HTTP servers are responding with the status code 404 Not Found when applying PUT to a resource which doesn't have a "handling controller / cannot be routed internally". "handling controller" is implementation detail and means: a GET request to that resource is 404. The nature of PUT is to create a resource if it doesn't exists! → 404 Not Found can never be an accurate status code (because of course the resouce doesn't exists, it should be created) I guess the proper response status code would be 405 Method Not allowed? → but this is also strange because it implies that there is already a resource? Otherwise I would use 400 Bad Request but this is to generic and not understandable by a client. Or maybe is 404 really correct? It can mean: "There is no resource" or also "There is no representation of the resource". In my opinion this should be clarified in the RFC.
Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 20:20:50 UTC