- From: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:44:32 +0900
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi, There is no description about the behavior of receiving PUSH_PUROMISE when SETTINGS_ENABLE_PUSH is 0. As the other errors caused by PUSH_PROMISE, MUST the receiver treat it as a connection error of type PROTOCOL_ERROR? The difference between two cases in receiving PUSH_PROMISE when SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS is 0 and when SETTINGS_ENABLE_PUSH is 0 is that the former accepts PUSH_PROMISE whereas the latter does not. Is this correct? And I also found no description of the case when a server receive PUSH_PROMISE. It should be also treated as a connection error. Right? Regards,
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2014 01:45:02 UTC