- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:38:42 +0100
- To: "Peter Lepeska" <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Le Lun 3 mars 2014 14:57, Peter Lepeska a écrit : > Thinking on this a bit more I realize that there is no need to redirect in > the case that I am describing where the proxy is in path and already sees > all traffic. Actually the general case is that the proxy is not in path. If this case is specified cleanly then an in-path proxy becomes just an out-of-path that happens to be located in-path. And I'm not sure it will be worth adding the complexity of a different optimised in-path variant if out-of-path is good enough for everyone. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Monday, 3 March 2014 14:39:30 UTC