W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Support for gzip at the server #424

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:21:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNcaO87Tw2j6fNiBwuaURhTbEx89XsqyG=3tBva2XwjUDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Compressed uploads isn't a new feature, but it has poor interop.
This would fix the interop problem.
On Mar 14, 2014 10:54 AM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 14 March 2014 10:42, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > imho, the simple solution is to mandate the presence of a header that
> > indicates the uncompressed content-length when sending compressed data on
> > http/2. This is generically useful in many applications in both
> directions.
>
> Not that it wouldn't work, but that sounds a little too much like a
> new feature to me.
>
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 18:22:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC