- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:53:54 +1300
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 18/03/2014 4:50 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: > It sounds like we have consensus to close #424 with no action. Anyone have a problem with that? > Is it worth proposing gzip as default Transfer-Encoding instead so its only done on DATA frames between hops known to be HTTP/2 at both ends? (ie after SETTINGS already confirms or breaks the connection). Amos
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2014 05:54:24 UTC