- From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:38:40 -0500
- To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
>>>>> "JR" == Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> writes: JR> If it can't do HTTP URIs, it's not a replacement. What we need to JR> argue about is not *whether* to support HTTP URIs, but *how*. The draft specifies http upgrade to support http/2 for http:// URIs. TLS has nothing to do with that issue. (Nor should it.) -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
Received on Friday, 7 March 2014 23:42:11 UTC