- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 03:24:45 -0800
- To: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Jan 31, 2014, at 5:24 AM, Michael Sweet wrote: > My only comment is that here and in 2.7.2 we are referencing RFC 2818, but that reference is informative. > > Shouldn't we be normatively referencing RFC 2818 since we are only updating it and not obsoleting it? I don't believe so -- the reference is informative because we don't depend on it for any of our syntax or requirements. When someone gets around to updating 2818, that spec will have a normative reference on this set since it requires https and HTTP. ....Roy
Received on Saturday, 1 February 2014 11:25:07 UTC