W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 14:57:35 +1300
Message-ID: <53113E8F.9080108@treenet.co.nz>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 1/03/2014 5:09 a.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> On 27 Feb 2014, at 6:22 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> (As proposed by Mark, "h2" would be exclusively for HTTP/2 over
>> cleartext TCP; I'd prefer to swap the labels, but we know what we call
>> that sort of argument.)
> 
> I’d be OK with “h2” for TLS and something like “h2p” (for “plaintext”).


FWIW: I prefer the orginal proposal where the 't' signified the
injection of TLS layer between HTTP/2 and TCP.

Amos
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2014 01:58:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC