- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 14:57:35 +1300
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 1/03/2014 5:09 a.m., Mark Nottingham wrote: > > On 27 Feb 2014, at 6:22 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> (As proposed by Mark, "h2" would be exclusively for HTTP/2 over >> cleartext TCP; I'd prefer to swap the labels, but we know what we call >> that sort of argument.) > > I’d be OK with “h2” for TLS and something like “h2p” (for “plaintext”). FWIW: I prefer the orginal proposal where the 't' signified the injection of TLS layer between HTTP/2 and TCP. Amos
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2014 01:58:10 UTC