Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO

On 28/1/14 12:11 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 27 January 2014 13:46, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>>    "A General Termination of Future Operations (GTFO) frame (type=0x7)
>> informs the remote peer to stop creating streams on this connection."
> Sounds good.
>
>> 2) The "future operations" appears to be redundant behind "terminate".
>> Perhapse it should just be named GENERAL_TERMINATE.
> Sounds like a name for a person not a description of a protocol feature.

A bond villain.

Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 08:46:18 UTC