From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:42:23 -0700

Message-ID: <CAP+FsNd5qD7dJhzp+7cykDmoV4K9ZRDx8N2Qnv3phPmKm9oZBg@mail.gmail.com>

To: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>

Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 18:42:23 -0700

Message-ID: <CAP+FsNd5qD7dJhzp+7cykDmoV4K9ZRDx8N2Qnv3phPmKm9oZBg@mail.gmail.com>

To: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>

Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>wrote: > I have following questions about dependency based properties. > > 1. Suppose we have formed following drpendency: > > A <- B (B depends on A) > A <- C > B <- D > If A and B cannot make a progress, do C and D have the same precedence? > A <-- B <-- D \- C I'd assume C would make progress before D given it is closer to the root. > 2. Another dependency setup: > > A <- B > A <- C > B <- D > C <- E > A <-- B <-- D \- C <-- E > If we make B depend on X, only B and C are moved to under X and > drpendency now looks like this: > > A <- C > C <- E > X <- B > B <- D > becomes: A <-- C <-- E X <-- B <-- D > Is this correct? > > 3. Same initial dependency setup with 2. > > If we move B to Y with exclusive flag set and we have Y <- Z dependency, > the final result look like this: > > Y <- B > B <- D > B <- Z > I'm honestly not sure what you're going for here. :) -=R > Is this correct? > > Best regards, > Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa >Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 01:42:50 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0
: Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:25 UTC
*