- From: <emile.stephan@orange.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:40:07 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: "Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group" <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Then it is preferable to have these discussions before Wednesday in the HTTPbis meeting. Why waiting Toronto HTTPbis meeting to decide ? Regards Emile -----Message d'origine----- De : Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 27 février 2014 19:30 À : Mark Nottingham Cc : Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group; ietf-http-wg@w3.org Objet : Re: Preliminary agenda for London On 26 February 2014 17:23, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > I also suspect we’ll get a lot more done in small-group discussion on Saturday, rather than queue-for-the-mic IETF fashion during the week, since this area still needs a *lot* of discussion. And I'll note for the record, and for the large number of people unfamiliar with the process, the process point here. No final decisions can be made at this meeting. It's the practice of the IETF that decisions are made and confirmed on working group mailing lists. I expect that we'll reach some informal conclusions during this meeting, but those decisions will be brought back here for confirmation. -----Message d'origine----- De : Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] Envoyé : jeudi 27 février 2014 02:24 À : Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group Cc : ietf-http-wg@w3.org Objet : Re: Preliminary agenda for London Hi Kevin, As discussed, the Working Group is currently committed to shipping HTTP/2 for WGLC, and we have a number of issues to discuss in London. If we get through those issues and have time left over (which I suspect we will), we can have a discussion of proxy work. Additionally, we’re having a Design Team Meeting on the following Saturday: https://github.com/http2/wg_materials/blob/master/interim-14-03/arrangements.md … where the schedule will be done in an unconference-ish way; i.e., driven by what the people who show up want to discuss. I also suspect we’ll get a lot more done in small-group discussion on Saturday, rather than queue-for-the-mic IETF fashion during the week, since this area still needs a *lot* of discussion. Cheers, On 26 Feb 2014, at 11:24 pm, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Please can we include a slot (e.g. 15mins) for the explicit proxy discussion in HTTPbis – Monday if possible? > > Cheers! > Kevin -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Received on Friday, 28 February 2014 08:40:36 UTC