- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:31:30 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Julian Reschke wrote: >However, just because there are concerns doesn't mean we can't mandate >it. If we all agree that client->server gzip is desirable, then the spec >should be clear about that. Be it in non-normative prose, with a >"SHOULD" or even a "MUST" (which would be similar to the "MUST support >chunked encoding" in 1.1). > >What I hear is that just because there are concerns we'll say nothing. >My take is that the situation will not improve unless we say *something*. That sounds pretty reasonable to me. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2014 18:32:15 UTC