- From: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:56:00 -0500
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 March 2014 10:42, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: >> imho, the simple solution is to mandate the presence of a header that >> indicates the uncompressed content-length when sending compressed data on >> http/2. This is generically useful in many applications in both directions. > > Not that it wouldn't work, but that sounds a little too much like a > new feature to me. > Request body compression is practically a new feature anyway - few clients do it today. A new header is relatively a trivial addition to the effort.
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 20:56:26 UTC