- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 18:23:22 +0000
- To: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
- cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CANmPAYFm=Vm-L=smSU8XVN6N4fjWWYr=Y0u+Bkg4ryWopZvUbA@mail.gmail.com> , Peter Lepeska writes: >Now to see which goals are met by each proposal... > >6.2. Goals I'd suggest we also look at how the proposed schemes handle when there are multiple proxies in the path between the client and server. Some of the schemes, #4 for instance, fails that criteria. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 18 January 2014 18:23:45 UTC