W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Feedback on draft-thomson-httpbis-catch

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:48:04 +0100
Message-ID: <531ECDC4.1020204@gmx.de>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-03-11 09:12, Martin Thomson wrote:
> Thanks Julian,
>
> https://github.com/martinthomson/drafts/commit/bbc206889f1946c6f4f020152bc0f0d4c956e328
>
> On 11 March 2014 08:46, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>     HTTP/2 [I-D.ietf-httpbis-http2] forbids the use of renegotiation,
>>>     except for at the very beginning of a connection.  This makes
>>>     addressing some client authentication use cases difficult.
>>
>> Not in the referenced version of the draft, right?
>
> True, but there doesn't seem to be much point in pursuing this draft
> if HTTP/2 doesn't make that statement :)

Yup - just clarifying...

>>> 2. Client Certificate Challenge
>>>
>>>     parameters other than "realm".  Other parameters MAY be used to
>>>     provide a client with information it can use to select an appropriate
>>>     certificate.  Unknown parameters MUST be ignored.
>>
>>
>> Do we need to be more specific? Is there something that could be
>> standardized here?
>
> I thought about that.  Maybe someone else can do the definition.  For
> instance, see Henry's use case and my response there.

Sounds good.
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2014 08:48:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC