Re: #551: recipient handling of trailer fields

* Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>and in the pseudo-code of 4.1.3 (Decoding Chunked):
>
>OLD:
>     read header-field
>     while (header-field not empty) {
>        append header-field to existing header fields
>        read header-field
>     }
>
>NEW:
>     read trailer field
>     while (trailer field is not empty) {
>        if trailer field is allowed to be sent in a trailer,
>            append trailer field to existing header fields
>        read trailer-field
>     }

I think the combination of comma and indentation is difficult to under-
stand. It would be better to be more explicit,

     read trailer field
     while (trailer field is not empty) {
        if (trailer field is allowed to be sent in a trailer) {
            append trailer field to existing header fields
        }
        read trailer-field
     }

for instance.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Friday, 31 January 2014 02:45:23 UTC