W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:23:41 +1100
Cc: IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A7976F6A-2803-4044-8A0A-0C694E4B1C92@mnot.net>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>

On 18 Feb 2014, at 8:52 pm, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

> Replying to myself, I'd like to make one point clear:
> It is ABSOLUTELY okay to use SRV so long as we accept that in some
> circumstances there will be some performance degradation, and that we
> will need to sort versioning beyond h2.  That latter issue implies some
> IN BAND upgrade mechanism for h2->hN.  In the case of TLS, we might
> simply handle this with ALPN, but someone from the TLS side should think
> about this in the context of a fast restart.

This is what’s concerned me in the past. We’ve made a lot of decisions based upon the assumption that introducing h3…hn (as well as other protocol identifiers) won’t require adding more round trips.

Now, with ALPN, that may be OK, but it doesn’t help for non-TLS deployments, such as they are.


Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 09:24:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC