W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

RE: Priority straw man

From: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 09:46:36 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6C71876BDCCD01488E70A2399529D5E532CCF8B8@ADELE.crf.canon.fr>
From my understanding, a good download order for resources is:
- Javascript first, one resource at a time, in document order;
- Media, possibly in parallel, as with progressive encoding, this allows early partial rendering.

This means that a specific ordering is desirable, but it may not be the document order, in particular because there are good reasons to put the Javascripts at the end of the document.

So I think that this feature is important.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com]
> Sent: mardi 4 février 2014 18:37
> To: RUELLAN Herve
> Cc: Mike Bishop; HTTP Working Group
> Subject: Re: Priority straw man
> On 4 February 2014 09:30, RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
> wrote:
> > However, as Mike said, it makes it hard to insert a new bucket in the middle
> of the list.
> > To go from (A, F) <- (B, C, G) <- (D, E)
> > To (A, F) <- (H) <- (B, C, G) <- (D, E), many re-prioritization are necessary.
> Yes, this is true.  A more important question is whether this is a
> feature that is important enough to justify the additional complexity.
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 09:47:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC