6/29/17 AGWG call Christopher Loiselle (Thursday, 29 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Wilco Fiers (Friday, 23 June)
- RE: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Abma, J.D. (Jake) (Monday, 26 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Glenda Sims (Monday, 26 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 lisa.seeman (Monday, 26 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 27 June)
- Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft John Foliot (Thursday, 22 June)
- RE: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Repsher, Stephen J (Thursday, 22 June)
- Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Detlev Fischer (Friday, 23 June)
- Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Abma, J.D. (Jake) (Friday, 23 June)
- Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Shadi Abou-Zahra (Friday, 23 June)
- Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Glenda Sims (Monday, 26 June)
- Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Jim Allan (Monday, 26 June)
- Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Joshue O Connor (Monday, 26 June)
- Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Joshue O Connor (Wednesday, 21 June)
- Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Joshue O Connor (Wednesday, 21 June)
- Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Laura Carlson (Thursday, 22 June)
- Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Christopher Loiselle (Thursday, 22 June)
- Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Joshue O Connor (Thursday, 22 June)
- MINUTES: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Michael Gower (Thursday, 22 June)
- RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Kathy Wahlbin (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Marc Johlic (Tuesday, 20 June)
- RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Abma, J.D. (Jake) (Wednesday, 21 June)
- Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Detlev Fischer (Wednesday, 21 June)
- Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Shadi Abou-Zahra (Wednesday, 21 June)
- Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 21 June)
- RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Katie Haritos-Shea (Wednesday, 21 June)
- RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Repsher, Stephen J (Friday, 23 June)
- Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Shadi Abou-Zahra (Friday, 23 June)
- Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Joshue O Connor (Friday, 23 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 David MacDonald (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Shawn Lauriat (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Katie Haritos-Shea (Monday, 19 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Bailey, Bruce (Tuesday, 20 June)
- RE: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Abma, J.D. (Jake) (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Christopher Loiselle (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Temp WebEx today: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 20 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Joshue O Connor (Tuesday, 20 June)
Re: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 20 June)
Bad link? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents Katie Haritos-Shea (Wednesday, 7 June)
- RE: Approval process for Understanding documents Denis Boudreau (Wednesday, 7 June)
- RE: Approval process for Understanding documents Chakravarthula, Srinivasu (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents Detlev Fischer (Wednesday, 7 June)
- RE: Approval process for Understanding documents Repsher, Stephen J (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 7 June)
- RE: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com (Thursday, 8 June)
- RE: Approval process for Understanding documents alands289@gmail.com (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 9 June)
- Re: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Katie Haritos-Shea (Wednesday, 7 June)
- RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Abma, J.D. (Jake) (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Wilco Fiers (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 7 June)
- RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Kathy Wahlbin (Wednesday, 7 June)
- RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft White, Jason J (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Detlev Fischer (Wednesday, 7 June)
- RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Repsher, Stephen J (Wednesday, 7 June)
- RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Marc Johlic (Thursday, 8 June)
- RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft alands289@gmail.com (Thursday, 8 June)
- Re: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 9 June)
Meeting minutes Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 6 June)
TPAC dates Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 6 June)
Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Marc Johlic (Thursday, 1 June)
Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 7 June)
- Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Detlev Fischer (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Greg Lowney (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 25 May)
- Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Joshue O Connor (Thursday, 25 May)
RE: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward White, Jason J (Thursday, 25 May)
- RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 David MacDonald (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Jim Allan (Tuesday, 23 May)
- RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 alands289@gmail.com (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Melanie Philipp (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Glenda Sims (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Gregg C Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. (Wednesday, 24 May)
- RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Repsher, Stephen J (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Katie Haritos-Shea (Wednesday, 24 May)
- RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Milliken, Neil (Thursday, 25 May)
- Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 25 May)
- RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC David MacDonald (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Shadi Abou-Zahra (Tuesday, 23 May)
- RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Kathy Wahlbin (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 23 May)
- RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC alands289@gmail.com (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer (Tuesday, 23 May)
- RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Repsher, Stephen J (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jim Allan (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Melanie Philipp (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Glenda Sims (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 25 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 26 May)
- RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC White, Jason J (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Sunday, 28 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Andrew Kirkpatrick (Sunday, 28 May)
- RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jonathan Avila (Sunday, 28 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Sunday, 28 May)
- RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jonathan Avila (Sunday, 28 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Sunday, 28 May)
- RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jonathan Avila (Sunday, 28 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Sunday, 28 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer (Sunday, 28 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Sunday, 28 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC David MacDonald (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC David MacDonald (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Joshue O Connor (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC David MacDonald (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 29 May)
Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Jim Allan (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: changes to plain language based on the feedback Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 15 May)
- Re: changes to plain language based on the feedback Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 15 May)
- RE: changes to plain language based on the feedback White, Jason J (Monday, 15 May)
- Re: changes to plain language based on the feedback John Foliot (Tuesday, 16 May)
- RE: changes to plain language based on the feedback White, Jason J (Tuesday, 16 May)
- might be last option for plain language lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 16 May)
- RE: might be last option for plain language White, Jason J (Tuesday, 16 May)
- Re: might be last option for plain language David MacDonald (Tuesday, 16 May)
- RE: might be last option for plain language White, Jason J (Tuesday, 16 May)
- Re: might be last option for plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 16 May)
- RE: might be last option for plain language White, Jason J (Tuesday, 16 May)
- Re: might be last option for plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 16 May)
- RE: might be last option for plain language White, Jason J (Tuesday, 16 May)
- Re: might be last option for plain language Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 17 May)
- Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language lisa.seeman (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Alastair Campbell (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language lisa.seeman (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Detlev Fischer (Monday, 22 May)
- RE: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language White, Jason J (Monday, 22 May)
- Combining the two.... Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: Combining the two.... Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language John Foliot (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: Combining the two.... Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 22 May)
- RE: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language White, Jason J (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 22 May)
RE: might be last option for plain language White, Jason J (Tuesday, 16 May)
we need to quantify what the issues can not be meet for plain language lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 17 May)
- Re: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Glenda Sims (Monday, 15 May)
- Re: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. (Tuesday, 16 May)
- Re: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Shawn Lauriat (Tuesday, 16 May)
- RE: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Bailey, Bruce (Tuesday, 16 May)
- Re: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Greg Lowney (Tuesday, 16 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts John Foliot (Tuesday, 9 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 9 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 9 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald (Tuesday, 9 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts White, Jason J (Tuesday, 9 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald (Tuesday, 9 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald (Tuesday, 9 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 9 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald (Wednesday, 10 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts White, Jason J (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald (Thursday, 11 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Repsher, Stephen J (Thursday, 11 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts White, Jason J (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 12 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Schnabel, Stefan (Friday, 12 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 12 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Schnabel, Stefan (Friday, 12 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 12 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 12 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts White, Jason J (Friday, 12 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 12 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 12 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 12 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts White, Jason J (Friday, 12 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 12 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 12 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Repsher, Stephen J (Friday, 12 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 12 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Repsher, Stephen J (Friday, 12 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Schnabel, Stefan (Friday, 12 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 12 May)
- RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Schnabel, Stefan (Monday, 15 May)
- Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 15 May)
Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 9 May)
RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Michael Pluke (Monday, 15 May)
RE: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) lisa.seeman (Thursday, 4 May)
Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) Dave Cramer (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF (Wednesday, 26 April)
- RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 26 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 26 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? James Nurthen (Wednesday, 26 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 26 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot (Wednesday, 26 April)
- RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Jonathan Avila (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? James Nurthen (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell (Friday, 28 April)
- RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 28 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Detlev Fischer (Friday, 28 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden (Sunday, 23 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Michael Pluke (Sunday, 23 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson (Monday, 24 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson (Monday, 24 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson (Monday, 24 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Repsher, Stephen J (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson (Monday, 24 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell (Monday, 24 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 25 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J (Tuesday, 25 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 25 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J (Tuesday, 25 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 25 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 25 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J (Tuesday, 25 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 25 April)
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Tuesday, 25 April)
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 24 April)
- Re: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Glenda Sims (Monday, 17 April)
- RE: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Alex Li (CELA) (Tuesday, 18 April)
- RE: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Crystal Jones (CELA) (Tuesday, 18 April)
- RE: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Hakkinen, Mark T (Tuesday, 18 April)
- Re: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Pietro (Tuesday, 18 April)
- Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 14 April)
- Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Laura Carlson (Friday, 14 April)
- Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 20 April)
- Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 20 April)
- RE: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) White, Jason J (Thursday, 20 April)
- Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 20 April)
- Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 20 April)
- Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 20 April)
- Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) David MacDonald (Thursday, 20 April)
- Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 20 April)
- Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 20 April)
- Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Alastair Campbell (Friday, 21 April)
- Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent David MacDonald (Friday, 21 April)
- Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent David MacDonald (Friday, 21 April)
- Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 21 April)
- Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Detlev Fischer (Friday, 21 April)
- Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Gregg C Vanderheiden (Saturday, 22 April)
- Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Gregg C Vanderheiden (Saturday, 22 April)
Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Wayne Dick (Friday, 14 April)
Call minutes Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 13 April)
- RE: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Thursday, 13 April)
- Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Laura Carlson (Thursday, 13 April)
- RE: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Michael Pluke (Thursday, 13 April)
- Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 13 April)
- RE: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com (Thursday, 13 April)
- Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Jeanne Spellman (Thursday, 13 April)
- Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Joshue O Connor (Wednesday, 19 April)
target size David MacDonald (Wednesday, 12 April)
Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 17 April)
Check List Wayne Dick (Wednesday, 5 April)
TPAC 2017 Survey Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 5 April)
- Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 4 April)
- Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Bailey, Bruce (Tuesday, 4 April)
- Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. (Tuesday, 4 April)
- Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 4 April)
Last message date: Friday, 30 June 2017 17:16:41 UTC